Comments on: Sneak peek at Flex beta 3 http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/ music, technology, interfaces, people Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:37:14 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: farz http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/comment-page-1/#comment-74446 farz Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:31:02 +0000 http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/#comment-74446 i cant wait, looks awesome, id like an offline API/doc, maybe with an update feature ? i cant wait, looks awesome, id like an offline API/doc, maybe with an update feature ?

]]> By: DClick Blog http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/comment-page-1/#comment-5293 DClick Blog Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:16:44 +0000 http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/#comment-5293 [...] Para quem ainda tinha duvidas se teria ou não o Flex 2 Beta 3 aqui esta a confirmação. Recentemente no blog kuwamoto.org foi divulgado algumas das modificações que compõe a nova versão do Flex Builder 2. Alem de correções de diversos bugs o Builder Beta 3 possui alterações bem interessantes de interface e principalmente em sua documentação. Outra modificação que chama a atenção, segundo ao post, é com relação ao consumo de memória pois foram feitas diversas modificações tanto no compilador como no editor que reduzem drasticamente o consumo de memória tendo assim um ganho considerado de performance. [...] [...] Para quem ainda tinha duvidas se teria ou não o Flex 2 Beta 3 aqui esta a confirmação. Recentemente no blog kuwamoto.org foi divulgado algumas das modificações que compõe a nova versão do Flex Builder 2. Alem de correções de diversos bugs o Builder Beta 3 possui alterações bem interessantes de interface e principalmente em sua documentação. Outra modificação que chama a atenção, segundo ao post, é com relação ao consumo de memória pois foram feitas diversas modificações tanto no compilador como no editor que reduzem drasticamente o consumo de memória tendo assim um ganho considerado de performance. [...]

]]> By: chris http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/comment-page-1/#comment-2195 chris Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:29:12 +0000 http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/#comment-2195 any chance anyone could post a flex2 beta 3 download link? I missed beta3 (only got beta2) and was hoping to try that out before I try the TRIAL version. TIA any chance anyone could post a flex2 beta 3 download link?

I missed beta3 (only got beta2) and was hoping to try that out before I try the TRIAL version.

TIA

]]> By: kirk jones http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/comment-page-1/#comment-564 kirk jones Wed, 24 May 2006 01:52:36 +0000 http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/#comment-564 I was just at Java One speaking and there was NO Flex, just ajax ajax ajax. The feature set Flex provides, as well as even Flash before, is much more robust, standard and easier to work with than an UI Web framework presented. right on mm...adobe. I was just at Java One speaking and there was NO Flex, just ajax ajax ajax. The feature set Flex provides, as well as even Flash before, is much more robust, standard and easier to work with than an UI Web framework presented.

right on mm…adobe.

]]> By: joshi pattabhi http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/comment-page-1/#comment-294 joshi pattabhi Fri, 05 May 2006 09:19:31 +0000 http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/#comment-294 very nice Looking for the new documentation. very nice
Looking for the new documentation.

]]> By: nz http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/comment-page-1/#comment-285 nz Mon, 01 May 2006 20:12:35 +0000 http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/#comment-285 Agree with Will, Tools/Plugins to help make consuming Web Services easier would be great (e.g. like the ones in Visual Studios for generating proxy objects etc), reckon that would set Flex apart from alot of Ajax Frameworks. Agree with Will, Tools/Plugins to help make consuming Web Services easier would be great (e.g. like the ones in Visual Studios for generating proxy objects etc), reckon that would set Flex apart from alot of Ajax Frameworks.

]]> By: sho http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/comment-page-1/#comment-284 sho Mon, 01 May 2006 17:09:16 +0000 http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/#comment-284 Will: Great idea, but we are basically feature complete at this point. Any new ideas will have to go into subsequent versions. John F: I used to be responsible for ColdFusion Studio among other things, so I know first hand what you're talking about. I have seen surveys like that, and my interpretation is usually that if people aren't using a particular debugger, it's usually because it isn't meeting people's needs, not because they don't want a debugger. The ColdFusion team is contributing code to the CFEclipse project, so look for more advancement there. Also, the CF team is spending a lot of time making sure that CF users can be productive with Flex within Eclipse. Check out their work on the labs site. Will: Great idea, but we are basically feature complete at this point. Any new ideas will have to go into subsequent versions.

John F: I used to be responsible for ColdFusion Studio among other things, so I know first hand what you’re talking about. I have seen surveys like that, and my interpretation is usually that if people aren’t using a particular debugger, it’s usually because it isn’t meeting people’s needs, not because they don’t want a debugger.

The ColdFusion team is contributing code to the CFEclipse project, so look for more advancement there. Also, the CF team is spending a lot of time making sure that CF users can be productive with Flex within Eclipse. Check out their work on the labs site.

]]> By: Will Morgan http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/comment-page-1/#comment-283 Will Morgan Mon, 01 May 2006 16:27:10 +0000 http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/#comment-283 Excellent & thank you! I would really like to know if there are any plans to build a visual webservices "property inspector" as I think there was in Flex 1.5, and as there is in the Flash 8 IDE. The auto-gen of an was very cool to have in 1.5... Anyway, thanks again! Excellent & thank you! I would really like to know if there are any plans to build a visual webservices “property inspector” as I think there was in Flex 1.5, and as there is in the Flash 8 IDE. The auto-gen of an was very cool to have in 1.5… Anyway, thanks again!

]]> By: Sam Robbins http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/comment-page-1/#comment-282 Sam Robbins Mon, 01 May 2006 14:17:43 +0000 http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/#comment-282 All I can say is wow! All I can say is wow!

]]> By: John Farrar http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/comment-page-1/#comment-280 John Farrar Mon, 01 May 2006 13:24:33 +0000 http://kuwamoto.org/2006/04/29/sneak-peek-at-flex-beta-3/#comment-280 OK... looks good. (So will there be a follow-up project on bringing CF to this level of support in Eclipse? It seems like there are "indicators" that Flex is seeking to work with CF. Yet, without a serious IDE for CF that is not as big a deal as it could be. It would be great for example if Eclipse provided an interactive debugger like VS2005, Zend, PHPEclipse, or even say... CFStudio with CF5! Again, I understand that there was a survey done that said debugging wasn't needed because people weren't using it. LOL... I am guessing the people who converted CF from C to Java used a debugger! What a scary thought to consider they didn't!) Just an item we need back... and your team could certainly bring this to pass. Will a new version of CF go into alpha soon? or When will the beta start? OK… looks good. (So will there be a follow-up project on bringing CF to this level of support in Eclipse? It seems like there are “indicators” that Flex is seeking to work with CF. Yet, without a serious IDE for CF that is not as big a deal as it could be. It would be great for example if Eclipse provided an interactive debugger like VS2005, Zend, PHPEclipse, or even say… CFStudio with CF5! Again, I understand that there was a survey done that said debugging wasn’t needed because people weren’t using it. LOL… I am guessing the people who converted CF from C to Java used a debugger! What a scary thought to consider they didn’t!)

Just an item we need back… and your team could certainly bring this to pass. Will a new version of CF go into alpha soon? or When will the beta start?

]]>