<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick analysis of Adobe and Buzzword</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kuwamoto.org/2007/10/01/quick-analysis-of-adobe-and-buzzword/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kuwamoto.org/2007/10/01/quick-analysis-of-adobe-and-buzzword/</link>
	<description>music, technology, interfaces, people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:37:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michal Migurski</title>
		<link>http://kuwamoto.org/2007/10/01/quick-analysis-of-adobe-and-buzzword/comment-page-1/#comment-64958</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal Migurski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kuwamoto.org/2007/10/01/quick-analysis-of-adobe-and-buzzword/#comment-64958</guid>
		<description>No unhappy, just totally baffled by Adobe&#039;s fragmentation of its product line since the Macromedia acquisition. Flash is our bread &amp; butter, yet it feels out-of-hand. Also, now a little embarrassed to have gotten all OMGWTFThermo not knowing you were on the team. =)

Would love to meet up sometime - will continue via e-mail...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No unhappy, just totally baffled by Adobe&#8217;s fragmentation of its product line since the Macromedia acquisition. Flash is our bread &amp; butter, yet it feels out-of-hand. Also, now a little embarrassed to have gotten all OMGWTFThermo not knowing you were on the team. =)</p>
<p>Would love to meet up sometime &#8211; will continue via e-mail&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sho</title>
		<link>http://kuwamoto.org/2007/10/01/quick-analysis-of-adobe-and-buzzword/comment-page-1/#comment-64613</link>
		<dc:creator>Sho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 05:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kuwamoto.org/2007/10/01/quick-analysis-of-adobe-and-buzzword/#comment-64613</guid>
		<description>Wow mike... Not happy? 

Thermo is not a new framework. It&#039;s a design tool for RIAs, and it uses the same flex frameworks that flexbuilder does (albeit a later version )

It&#039;s the thing I spent most of my time working on until I recently quit adobe. I&#039;d be glad to have lunch with you sometime to shoot the sh@t about it if you&#039;re interested. (lunch offer only valid to folks like mike who i know from way back :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow mike&#8230; Not happy? </p>
<p>Thermo is not a new framework. It&#8217;s a design tool for RIAs, and it uses the same flex frameworks that flexbuilder does (albeit a later version )</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the thing I spent most of my time working on until I recently quit adobe. I&#8217;d be glad to have lunch with you sometime to shoot the sh@t about it if you&#8217;re interested. (lunch offer only valid to folks like mike who i know from way back :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michal Migurski</title>
		<link>http://kuwamoto.org/2007/10/01/quick-analysis-of-adobe-and-buzzword/comment-page-1/#comment-64485</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal Migurski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 23:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kuwamoto.org/2007/10/01/quick-analysis-of-adobe-and-buzzword/#comment-64485</guid>
		<description>So ... what the hell is Thermo? It might be best for Adobe to chill the hell out and stop releasing products that step on each other&#039;s toes like this. I&#039;m finally beginning to understand what they&#039;ve done to Flash in splitting Flex Builder off, and the company is still coming fast &amp; furious with hot! new! frameworks! for making things! easier! for designers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So &#8230; what the hell is Thermo? It might be best for Adobe to chill the hell out and stop releasing products that step on each other&#8217;s toes like this. I&#8217;m finally beginning to understand what they&#8217;ve done to Flash in splitting Flex Builder off, and the company is still coming fast &amp; furious with hot! new! frameworks! for making things! easier! for designers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sho</title>
		<link>http://kuwamoto.org/2007/10/01/quick-analysis-of-adobe-and-buzzword/comment-page-1/#comment-64071</link>
		<dc:creator>Sho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kuwamoto.org/2007/10/01/quick-analysis-of-adobe-and-buzzword/#comment-64071</guid>
		<description>Great news!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Shebanow</title>
		<link>http://kuwamoto.org/2007/10/01/quick-analysis-of-adobe-and-buzzword/comment-page-1/#comment-63977</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Shebanow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 02:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kuwamoto.org/2007/10/01/quick-analysis-of-adobe-and-buzzword/#comment-63977</guid>
		<description>Buzzword will still be free to all comers. We intend to add additional features over time as premium services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buzzword will still be free to all comers. We intend to add additional features over time as premium services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Potter</title>
		<link>http://kuwamoto.org/2007/10/01/quick-analysis-of-adobe-and-buzzword/comment-page-1/#comment-63916</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 01:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kuwamoto.org/2007/10/01/quick-analysis-of-adobe-and-buzzword/#comment-63916</guid>
		<description>Nice post, glad to see you&#039;re still posting.

I&#039;d love your thoughts on monetization models of RIAs.  I think the fremium model actually has a lot of potential on the web.  In fact, we&#039;re seeing an increase use of that these days: Gmail is free, but more storage costs you.  Picnik is free, but some filters and effects are available to premium members only.  

I&#039;ve talked to a few people here and they&#039;re thinking that advertising is the way to go with this app (not people who would be making that decision, thankfully.)  Analyze the content, and display relevant ads beside it.  I don&#039;t buy it: I don&#039;t want ads based on the content of my docs, and in many cases you couldn&#039;t find a relevant ad for them anyways (my status report would be a good example.).   In my mind, Yahoo has the potential here for taking the online ad lead, they&#039;ve got the best ad system based on user behaviour.  But, who wants to see ads based on their previous behaviour, sounds a bit too big brother for me.

So, I do believe that the freemium model will eventually lead the way online - the free version gets users, and the power users pay for everyone else to keep using it.  

Mike

P.S.  I don&#039;t know how you connected Buzzword and the enterprise - I haven&#039;t thought of it as an enterprise play.  Office is too hard to topple there IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, glad to see you&#8217;re still posting.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love your thoughts on monetization models of RIAs.  I think the fremium model actually has a lot of potential on the web.  In fact, we&#8217;re seeing an increase use of that these days: Gmail is free, but more storage costs you.  Picnik is free, but some filters and effects are available to premium members only.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve talked to a few people here and they&#8217;re thinking that advertising is the way to go with this app (not people who would be making that decision, thankfully.)  Analyze the content, and display relevant ads beside it.  I don&#8217;t buy it: I don&#8217;t want ads based on the content of my docs, and in many cases you couldn&#8217;t find a relevant ad for them anyways (my status report would be a good example.).   In my mind, Yahoo has the potential here for taking the online ad lead, they&#8217;ve got the best ad system based on user behaviour.  But, who wants to see ads based on their previous behaviour, sounds a bit too big brother for me.</p>
<p>So, I do believe that the freemium model will eventually lead the way online &#8211; the free version gets users, and the power users pay for everyone else to keep using it.  </p>
<p>Mike</p>
<p>P.S.  I don&#8217;t know how you connected Buzzword and the enterprise &#8211; I haven&#8217;t thought of it as an enterprise play.  Office is too hard to topple there IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
